Tag Archives: Gorm Heron

World’s Largest In Situ Thermal Desorption Project: Challenges and Solutions

TerraTherm and its In Situ Thermal Desorption (ISTD) sublicense holders have cleaned close to 50 sites, but what happens when we are presented with one that is remarkably large with more than 100,000 cubic yards (76,500 m3) of PCE and TCE rich soils to a depth of over 40 feet (12 m)? The site in particular that was presented to TerraTherm was a former aerospace manufacturing facility and had to be remediated in less than a year. Successfully completed by TerraTherm, this site in Teterboro, New Jersey is now the largest ISTD project to date. The redevelopment of this former … Continue reading

Posted in In Situ Thermal Remediation, Sites/Projects, Technologies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thermal Treatment of Fractured Rock – How is it Different?

Fractured rock sites are different – often it is difficult even to determine how deep the Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) has gone, and to define what we refer to as the “source area”. Some sites have NAPL in the fractures, and some have most of the mass trapped in the matrix, into which it has diffused over decades. This blog post discusses the two main challenges: How to decide on the thermal treatment volume without making the problem worse. How to design and implement an effective and safe thermal system. For any aggressive source treatment to be cost-effective, it is … Continue reading

Posted in FAQs, In Situ Thermal Remediation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Eight Misconceptions about Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH) and Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH)

The Internet can be a tricky place. Sometimes when researching, it can become difficult to weed through the piles of information. Through some research of my own, I’ve come to find that there exist a few common misconceptions about thermal technologies. Many companies only practice one method of thermal heating, so it is understandable that misconceptions about another technology arise. TerraTherm on the other hand practices all three of the most accepted and mainstream methods of heating the subsurface: Thermal Conductive Heating (TCH), Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH), and Steam Enhanced Extraction (SEE). This post is meant to clarify misconceptions between … Continue reading

Posted in FAQs, In Situ Thermal Remediation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vapor Extraction and Pneumatic Control in Clay

Many sites at which remediation using thermal methods is being considered contain thick clay layers in the subsurface. The difficulty with treating clay is that it is not very permeable, meaning liquids will not move through it rapidly. Chemicals often get stuck within the clay matrix and cannot be removed easily unless one heats the clay to boiling temperatures.  But how will the chemicals move out of such a tight material?  If the clay consists of tiny particles and minerals, too small for water to move more than a few meters in a year, how can we get the chemicals … Continue reading

Posted in FAQs, In Situ Thermal Remediation | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Webinar: Thermal Remediation of LNAPL

In case you missed our last installment of “Inside In Situ Thermal Remediation”, TerraTherm’s new informational webinar series, you can find a recorded version here: The focus of this presentation was to provide an overview of thermal treatment options for LNAPL-contaminated sites, and will cover: Thermal remediation progress over the last 10 years, Similarities between In Situ Thermal Remediation (ISTR) and thermally enhanced oil recovery, LNAPL remediation case studies, and A large LNAPL spill case – using the energy in the recovered fuel to power remediation and obtain sustainable clean-up. TerraTherm uses all three main thermal technologies: Steam Enhanced Extraction, … Continue reading

Posted in In Situ Thermal Remediation, Webinars | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where Did In Situ Thermal Remediation (ISTR) Methods Come From?

Looking at a built-up thermal site with heaters, wells, manifold piping, process gear, and the advanced monitoring systems which can be accessed from anywhere in the world, it can be tempting to wonder how this all came about…  Hundreds of engineering details, program logic controlling automatic operation of valves, heating systems, and treatment equipment.  Yet, the systems run overnight and on weekends, with nobody there to baby-sit them.   Most of the features of a modern In Situ Thermal Remediation (ISTR) site have evolved over a period of less than 25 years.  I will try to explain the evolution here. Chemicals … Continue reading

Posted in FAQs, History, In Situ Thermal Remediation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment